Note
Go to the end to download the full example code.
Compares matrix multiplication implementations with timeit¶
numpy has a very fast implementation of
matrix multiplication. There are many ways to be slower.
The following uses timeit to compare implementations.
Compared implementations:
Preparation¶
import timeit
import numpy
from teachcompute.validation.cython.td_mul_cython import (
multiply_matrix,
c_multiply_matrix,
c_multiply_matrix_parallel,
c_multiply_matrix_parallel_transposed as cmulparamtr,
)
va = numpy.random.randn(150, 100).astype(numpy.float64)
vb = numpy.random.randn(100, 100).astype(numpy.float64)
ctx = {
"va": va,
"vb": vb,
"c_multiply_matrix": c_multiply_matrix,
"multiply_matrix": multiply_matrix,
"c_multiply_matrix_parallel": c_multiply_matrix_parallel,
"c_multiply_matrix_parallel_transposed": cmulparamtr,
}
Measures¶
numpy
res0 = timeit.timeit("va @ vb", number=100, globals=ctx)
print("numpy time", res0)
numpy time 0.023710604999905627
python implementation
res1 = timeit.timeit("multiply_matrix(va, vb)", number=10, globals=ctx)
print("python implementation", res1)
python implementation 5.634933213000295
cython implementation
res2 = timeit.timeit("c_multiply_matrix(va, vb)", number=100, globals=ctx)
print("cython implementation", res2)
cython implementation 0.10908522800036735
cython implementation parallelized
res3 = timeit.timeit("c_multiply_matrix_parallel(va, vb)", number=100, globals=ctx)
print("cython implementation parallelized", res3)
cython implementation parallelized 0.11675325099986367
cython implementation parallelized, AVX + transposed
res4 = timeit.timeit(
"c_multiply_matrix_parallel_transposed(va, vb)", number=100, globals=ctx
)
print("cython implementation parallelized avx", res4)
cython implementation parallelized avx 0.00955157299995335
Speed up…
numpy is 237.654552 faster than pure python.
numpy is 4.600694 faster than cython.
numpy is 4.924094 faster than parallelized cython.
numpy is 0.402840 faster than avx parallelized cython.
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 5.980 seconds)